20130703 - Meeting minutes, Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013
OpenNCP Weekly Sprint Meeting
3rd Jul 10:00 to 11:00 CET
Work RoadMap - epSOS 2 Services
1º Sprint: 28Jan > 8 Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
2º Sprint: 11Fev > 22Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
3º Sprint: 25Fev > 8Mar (2 weeks) > Completed
4º Sprint: 11Mar > 22Mar (2 weeks) (<- both weeks, or perhaps just the last week could be the code freeze?) Completed
- Release date: 25March (Monday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 > Postpone
5º Sprint: 25Mar > 8Apr (2 weeks) Completed
- Release date: 10Apr (Thursday) > OpenNCP 1.1.2 > Completed (Release Notes)
- Release date: 11Apr (Thursday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 > Postpone
6º Sprint: 22Apr> 3May (2 weeks) > Completed
- Release date: 8May (Wednesday) > OpenNCP 1.1.3 > Completed (Release Notes)
7º Sprint: 6May> 17May (2 weeks) > Completed
- Release date: 22 May (Thursday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 (Postpone)
8º Sprint: 20May> 31May (2 weeks) > Completed
- Goal: PAC + HCER QA
9º Sprint: 3June> 14June (2 weeks) > Completed
- Support OpenNCP 1.1.3 (used in )
- Release OpenNCP 2.0.0 > 19 June (Thursday)
10º Sprint: 24June > 5July (2 weeks) > in Progress
- Goal 1: PAC + HCER > Audit Trail Messages (Compliance)
- Goal 2: HCER > Document Automated Tests (Quality)
- //Goal 3: PS + PAC > Document & Transactions Automated Tests (Quality)
- //Goal 4: eP/eD > Document & Transactions Automated Tests (Quality)
Current SPRINT -
FI: ??? Goal 1;
PT: Goal 2;
SW: NO availability;
CH: ??
Agenda
1. OpenNCP Support
2. OpenNCP 2.0.1 Progress
3. PAC & HCER Audit Trail
4. MRO Service Specification discussion
5. TSAM-sync adaptation for CTS2 compliance
Location
Skype ()
Participants:
1. OpenNCP Support
- PT: working hard to go live
- Current constraint: central services are not available for new content, since the migration started;
- MF: Date planned for availability: End of June! - but Milan has left the project. Who is the new contact point for this?
- KT: were working with the new Central Services in order to configure VPN;
- MOST IMPORTANT: VPN may be not so important (this is not relaxation, before this mechanism was not in place). Certificates submission & sync mechanism;
- LKM: Will inform Marcello and Juergen the situation point.
- Italian NCP takes between 10 to 15 seconds responding;
- Mate: Says it ok.
- Norbert: Says it was ok in April, but currently is unknown;
- Marcello Melgare: Assertions in future cannot be sent (this may result in service failure); It needs clock sync from every countrys;
- KT: Every NCP must support IHE CT profile - must be synchronize;
- MM: PPT env delay is a known feature; for Operation environment may be better;
- LKM: Referred that "PS breaking the glass" caused some doubts about belonging
- MM: confirm that at this point the emergency scenario is scope;
- Confirm that Audit Messages for emergency scenarios area being specialized;
- MM: confirm that at this point the emergency scenario is scope;
- LKM: Patient Identifier may cause some because numbers
- MM: there is hope for the future regarding eSense and Stork;
- Increase the size of the input field and helping image;
- LKM: Physician evaluation questionnaire requires password protected:
- +++++++
An e-mail i got from the administrator or Questionnaire Portal:
Hello Marcelo
Unfortunately URL log-ins are disabled for security reasons. It just creates too many security loopholes in my opinion. If you feel that the Portal-B interface is secure enough, I suggest you display the credentials before the link
Best Regards,
Ion
- +++++++
- MM: this is country decision, so Portugal must decides what is the country strategy and then ask for epSOS support;
- +++++++
- MM: Spain is blocked for going to operation because:
- incident 310 accur in TianiNCP
- KTT: confirms it does not happen in OpenNCP;
2. OpenNCP 2.0.1 Progress
- Goal 1: PAC + HCER > Audit Trail Messages (Compliance)
- Mika return at end of July; Konstantin come back middle August;
- No job has been done;
- Goal 2: HCER > Document Automated Tests (Quality)
- No job has been done;
- SW: in realistic perspective, unfortunately
- Slovenian: How is your availability?
- MM:
- LKM: formalize the effort we need for OpenNCP support and sustainability;
3. MRO Service Specification discussion
- LKM: Ask for the specification team to clarify and meet with the development team;