OpenNCP Weekly Sprint Meeting

26th August 11:00 to 12:00  CET

Work RoadMap - epSOS 2 Services

1º Sprint: 28Jan > 8 Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
2º Sprint: 11Fev > 22Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
3º Sprint: 25Fev > 8Mar (2 weeks) > Completed
4º Sprint: 11Mar > 22Mar (2 weeks) Completed

5º Sprint: 25Mar > 8Apr (2 weeks) Completed 

6º Sprint: 22Apr> 3May (2 weeks) > Completed 

 7º Sprint: 6May> 17May (2 weeks)  > Completed

 8º Sprint: 20May> 31May (2 weeks)  > Completed

 9º Sprint: 3June> 14June (2 weeks)  > Completed

10º Sprint: 24June > 19July (4 weeks)  > in Progress

• Release OpenNCP 2.0.1 > 31 July, 2013 (Wednesday) 6th August

Agenda

a) Dissemination documentation progress

b) Bug Fixing progress

c) TransformationManager update progress

d) RoadMap consolidation (dates and features included)

Location

Skype (sirLicman) + Jira Board + MeetingWords (http://meetingwords.com/csPSTM2Iwm)

Participants:

Aarne Roosi <Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com>, 

Alexander Berler <a.berler@gnomon.com.gr>, 

Anders Nyström <Anders.Nystrom@apotekensservice.se>, 

Arnaud Gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>,

Belani Hrvoje <Hrvoje.Belani@hzzo.hr>,

Fredrik Dahlman <fredrik.dahlman@cag.se>,

[yes] Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>, 

Gergely Heja <heja.gergely@eski.hu>,

Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>,

Ljubi Igor <Igor.Ljubi@hzzo.hr>,

Ivo Pinheiro <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>, 

[yes] Konstantin Hypponen <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>, 

Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>, 

[yes] Licinio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>,

[yes] Marcello Melgara <Marcello.Melgara@cnt.lispa.it>,

Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>, 

Mate Beštek <mate.bestek@gmail.com>,

Mika Myllyvirta <mika.myllyvirta@kela.fi>, 

Mindaugas Ajauskas <mindaugas.ajauskas@lispa.it>, 

[yes] Norbert Repas <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>,

Patrick Ruch <Patrick.Ruch@unige.ch>,

Per Loubjerg <consult@loubjerg.dk>,

Tomaz Cebular <Tomaz.Cebular@ivz-rs.si>,

Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>, 

Stefan Gustafsson <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>, 

[yes] Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>,

MEETING NOTES

a) Dissemination documentation progress

- LKM: shared the terms for the glossary;

-- Kathrin: witing feedback;

-- Marcello: for the website, it is enough to provide 1 line: "an Open Source version is publicly made available.

in addition the flyer: http://www.epsos.eu/fileadmin/content/pdf/epSOS_Technical_Aspects_2012.pdf has to be revised. it is just two pages in total 

-- [ACTION] LKM: epSOS Technical Aspects > 

- Gareth Woodham: Installation Manual https://openncp.atlassian.net/wiki/display/ncp/OpenNCP+Installation+Overview

-- [ACTION] Norbert Review available 30 August!!!, 

---- [NR] Short Note: On Tuesday (27/08/2013) and Friday (30/08/2013) I am out of office, so in the worst case the review will be completed on Monday. thx.

b) Bug Fixing progress

https://openncp.atlassian.net/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=2

c) TransformationManager update progress

- (Gareth available today and tomorrow): - dificult to understand what has changed since last version

d) RoadMap consolidation (dates and features included)

- PPT need for PNs that adopt 2.0.2?

-- [LKM] OpenNCP Recommendation to TPM

-- [OpenNCP Comm] believes that there is no need for doing that;

-- [MM] Relaxation may be accepted by TPM, but each PN is responsible for there implementation;

-- [MM] which are the minimal test to do, having in mind jump from V1 to V2 (Simplification PPT)???

---- [KTT] all PPT tests could be skipped, except documents validation and e2e testing;

---- [NR] A test has meaning and purpose only when it is performed as detailed as possible. I´v tried it in the past with ClosedSourceOpenNCP incl. Scrutiny tests and so on. Only in this case is it possible to detect errors. But we have reached such a stage in the project where the requirements to fulfill and to behave consistently becomes more difficult. This role should be adopted and monitored by the regression automation, where possible.

---- [GW] We totally agree that a suite of regression tests should be performed when changing version, minor or major doesn't really matter.  Both maj/min releases can potentiallyt introduce new bugs

---- [GW]  we feel that regression tests hsould be a subset of the ppt test suite.  countries upgrading a version and doing ppt should do regression tests only, not full ppt

---- [GW]  full ppt requires large effort from country.  this will deter countries from upgrading, many may choose to stay on old version.,  this creates maintenance problems

---- [LKM] the V1 to v2 jump also had big improvments and bug fixes. What tests should be done regarding those changes? Post this uqestion to Kostas and Marcelo fonseca

---- Probably the solution may be NOT REGRESSION TEST but a simplified QA stage before entering operation with new version.

- RoadMap

          OSS NCP V2.0.2                      2013-09-10   Transformation Manager + Emergency Scenario + Bug Fixing       

          OSS NCP V2.0.3 (after PPT)   2013-10-02   OPERATION   Ready for: PAC + HCER epSOS 2 Services   

          OSS NCP V2.1.0                      2013-10-30   PPT Ready for: MRO + TSAM-sync (adaptation for CTS2 compliance)       

          OSS NCP V2.1.1 (after PPT)   2013-12-05   OPERATION   Ready for: ?? 

NEXT Steps