Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 10
Next »
Date
Attendees
Goals
- Follow-up of STORK demo;
- Next-steps and actions;
- Concerns about PAC;
- Contract issues;
- Other questions and issues;
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 15 min | Follow-up of STORK demo; | | Gottfried: "it was the review of 3rd period" "Some network problems at Monday, related to local infra-structure" "24 People representing all the Working Packages;" "Initial presentation about eHealth on STORK: some issues related with the lack of participants presented;" "The reviewer gave some contacts of a dannish company also implementing eIdentification;" "eHealth was the only live demo (others were shown as video);" "We need to find pilots for STORK, running in production system: BIG CHALLENGE" The pilot has to run in the minimun for 12 months: means we have to start lately in SETEMBER 2014; Robert had a discussion with political people from regions in Austria about epSOS and documents exchange; ..to evaluate the possibility to participate in STORK pilots and also to use OpenNCP for this; Gottfried will ask for Prof. Henrique Martins to gather other pilots for STORK; eHealth subnet group is sending a propose to CEF to found epSOS continuity; 
Soeren: "Evaluate the possibility to combine the work that needs to be performed in STORK with eSENS"
Isabel "Portugal is interested in running a Pilot for Patient eIdentification, according to Licínio Mano form SPMS"
|
| 15 min | Next-steps and actions | | |
| 5 min | Concerns about PAC | | |
| 5 min | Contract issues | | |
| 5 min | Other questions and issues | - | |
Action items