Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

Goals

...

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
15 20 min

Follow-up of STORK demo;

Gottfried:

"it was the review of 3rd period"

"Some network problems at Monday, related to local infra-structure"

"24 People representing all the Working Packages;"

"Initial presentation about eHealth on STORK: some issues related with the lack of participants presented;"

"The reviewer gave some contacts of a dannish company also implementing eIdentification;"

"eHealth was the only live demo (others were shown as video);"

"We need to find pilots for STORK, running in production system: BIG CHALLENGE"

The pilot has to run in the minimun for 12 months: means we have to start lately in SETEMBER 2014;

Robert had a discussion with political people from regions in Austria about epSOS and documents exchange;

..to evaluate the possibility to participate in STORK pilots and also to use OpenNCP for this;

Gottfried will ask for Prof. Henrique Martins to gather other pilots for STORK;

eHealth subnet group is sending a propose to CEF to found epSOS continuity; (question)

I learn a lot from the reviews, and I would like to see more functions (in the OpenNCP)

Patient Consent is a very crucial topic.

If you have Patient Access you should have more functionalities, such as consent adjustments, and others;

To have a delegation process - to allow delegated persons to check other peoples documents;

Soeren:

"Evaluate the possibility to combine the work that needs to be performed in STORK with eSENS"

Isabel

"Portugal is interested in running a Pilot for Patient eIdentification, according to Licínio Mano form SPMS"

15

Robert

10 minNext-steps and actions 
5 minConcerns about PAC 
5 minContract issues 
5 minOther questions and issues- 

...