OpenNCP - Strategic Release Plan

15 Mar 08:30 to 09:30 CET

Work RoadMap

1º Sprint: 28Jan > 8 Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
2º Sprint: 11Fev > 22Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
3º Sprint: 25Fev > 8Mar (2 weeks) > Completed
4º Sprint: 11Mar > 22Mar (2 weeks) > WE ARE HERE (<- both weeks, or perhaps just the last week could be the code freeze?)
- Release date: 25March (Monday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0
-- Release Notes

Agenda

Release Management Plan
QA Process - Team
Development Status

Location

Skype: skype: steen.manniche (if Steen not available: sirLicman)

Participants:

Licinio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>,
Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>,
Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,
Alexander Berler (a.berler@gnomon.com.gr) <a.berler@gnomon.com.gr>,
Anders Nyström <Anders.Nystrom@apotekensservice.se>,
Arnaud Gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>,
Fredrik Dahlman <fredrik.dahlman@cag.se>,
Gergely Heja <heja.gergely@eski.hu>,
Ivo Pinheiro (ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt) <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>,
Konstantin Hypponen <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>,
Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>,
Marcello Melgara <Marcello.Melgara@cnt.lispa.it>,
Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>,
Mika Myllyvirta <mika.myllyvirta@kela.fi>,
Mindaugas Ajauskas <mindaugas.ajauskas@lispa.it>,
Norbert Repas <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>,
Stefan Gustafsson (stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se) <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,
Aarne Roosi (Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com) <Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com>,
Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>
Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>

MEETING NOTES

1. Release Management Plan (2 versions vs 1 version)

[Marcelo]

We are few in the OpenNCP Community
We should not proliferate technical solutions
We should not start something call 2.x and maintain something call 1.x.
2.0.0 should be fully compliant with the the 1.x.x
Work for sustainability, to many branches will be difficult to maintain in the future.

[Licinio]

Why and what where the reasons why 2.x.x

[Konstantin]

Incompatibilities
- Specifications concerning audit messages are incompatible;
- It does not affect semantic interoperability or other interoperability dimentions.

[Steen]

Agrees with konstantin
...

[Marcello]

Witch are the audit messages incompatibilities?
- Should we rise the issue in order to avoid the incompatibilities?

[Konstantin]

ATNA changes?? but not

2. QA Process - Team

[to do]

3. Development Status