Estimated - 13:00 to 14:00 CET
Performed - to CET
Room Passcode: (Ask if necessary)
----------------
If you have never attended an Adobe Connect meeting before:
Test your connection: http://ec-wacs.adobeconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm
Get a quick overview: http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeconnect.html
Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat and Adobe Connect are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and/or other countries.
Today's Meeting Participants:
National Connector
Massi has updated the References adding the original docs:
The process manager has been in workflow manager and national connector. The sequence of actions is always the same.
The state is in the national connector, while the wm is just keeping the sequence for contacting the NCP stateless services.
Which components are affected? 2 missing components
S asks the following questions:
This way we can fix the issue of assertion mechanism? Massimiliano Masi: yes. Only the workflow manager must be responsible.
The portal needs to be changed? Yes.
The credential part of the portal is the responsibility of the MS?
The NCP responsibility is to check the link between this user and the certificate in order to be sure the user is authorized to access.
The NCP does not authenticate the user, only brokerage
In NCPA we'll have an audit trail
Suggestion of Heiko Zimmermann: would it be feasible with a signature in addition to the the token? Yes
Questions:
2 APIS: 1 for workflow manager, 1 for national connector
Suggestion to use IHE transation for national connector. Kostas Karkaletsissuggested to use RESTfull. Massimiliano Masiadded that IHE provides it as well.
Do we need REM evidences? In massi's view, yes.
What is the portal adapter? To be asked to Marcello Melgara. michele.foucart will ask
Access control component
Kostas Karkaletsis and Joao Cunha agree that it is clear now to implement.
It has to be implemented by each country => each country to decide.
Stéphane Spahni and Massimiliano Masi: we should agree on 1 implementation, and at the same time the architecture leave the MS free to implement what they want.
Massimiliano Masi would suggest to open a consultation with MS via the OpenNCP mailing list. Massimiliano Masi, Joao Cunha and Kostas Karkaletsis will formalize the question in an e-mail and michele.foucart will send to the mailing list
Implementation will take a couple of weeks so suggestion to work on this after the Connectathon
We have created an epic dedicated to performance and security. We could use the same epic?
Kostas had a look at them, but needs some more time to provide feedback on it. Afterwads, new issues related to the task list will be added by S + include issues TSL editor from Joao
Joao adds the following: