OpenNCP Weekly Sprint Meeting

18th Jun 10:00 to 11:30 CET

Work RoadMap - epSOS 2 Services

1º Sprint: 28Jan > 8 Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
2º Sprint: 11Fev > 22Fev (2 weeks) > Completed
3º Sprint: 25Fev > 8Mar (2 weeks) > Completed
4º Sprint: 11Mar > 22Mar (2 weeks) ~~(<- both weeks, or perhaps just the last week could be the code freeze?)~~ Completed

Release date: 25March (Monday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 > Postpone

5º Sprint: 25Mar > 8Apr (2 weeks) Completed

Release date: 10Apr (Thursday) > OpenNCP 1.1.2 > Completed (Release Notes)
Release date: 11Apr (Thursday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 > Postpone

6º Sprint: 22Apr> 3May (2 weeks) > Completed

Release date: 8May (Wednesday) > OpenNCP 1.1.3 > Completed (Release Notes)

7º Sprint: 6May> 17May (2 weeks) > Completed

Release date: 22 May (Thursday) > OpenNCP 2.0.0 (Postpone)

8º Sprint: 20May> 31May (2 weeks) > Completed

Goal: PAC + HCER QA

9º Sprint: 3June> 14June (2 weeks) > in Progress

Support OpenNCP 1.1.3 (used in 4th PPT-slot as May 27th - June 7th)
Release OpenNCP 2.0.0 > 19 June (Thursday)

Agenda

1. OpenNCP Support

2. PAC QA Stage

3. HCER QA Stage

4. epSOS 2.0 Audit Trail EventIDs (Discussion of Roadmap)

5. epSOS2: TSAM adaptation for CTS2 compliance

Location

NetViewer + VOIP

Participants:

Aarne Roosi <Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com>,

Alexander Berler <a.berler@gnomon.com.gr>,

Anders Nyström <Anders.Nystrom@apotekensservice.se>,

[yes] Arnaud Gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>,

[yes] Belani Hrvoje <Hrvoje.Belani@hzzo.hr>,

Fredrik Dahlman <fredrik.dahlman@cag.se>,

Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>,

Gergely Heja <heja.gergely@eski.hu>,

Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>,

Ljubi Igor <Igor.Ljubi@hzzo.hr>,

Ivo Pinheiro <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>,

Konstantin Hypponen <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>,

[yes] Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>,

[yes] Licinio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>,

[yes] Marcello Melgara <Marcello.Melgara@cnt.lispa.it>,

[yes] Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>,

Mate Beštek <mate.bestek@gmail.com>,

Mika Myllyvirta <mika.myllyvirta@kela.fi>,

Mindaugas Ajauskas <mindaugas.ajauskas@lispa.it>,

[yes] Norbert Repas <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>,

Patrick Ruch <Patrick.Ruch@unige.ch>,

[yes] Per Loubjerg <consult@loubjerg.dk>,

Tomaz Cebular <Tomaz.Cebular@ivz-rs.si>,

Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,

Stefan Gustafsson <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,

[yes] Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>,

MEETING NOTES

1. PAC QA Stage

- The service implementation is complete.

- What needs to be done in order to allow end-2-end test?

-- Solve: TM-47 (Stéphane will check with Arnaud - can work on it only on the 17th of June)

--- [LKM-DONE] The issue does not BLOCK the release, so it should move to the Support Board (leaving the Development Board).

-- Dependency: How to TEST?

--- It is a one side workflow - so PN should test using the OpenNCP 2.0.0 artefacts.

- [MF-ToDo] Clarify, in th PAC confluence page, how it is possible to use the PAC service without using the Gnomon Portal (using another Portal solution).

-- Dependency: How to access auditing compliance ?

--- Do we need to test transactions on the PAC workflow?

--- The transactions are the same used in the Identification Service and Patient Service, but the AUDIT messages need to be produced according new SPECS.

---- Probably there is the need to chage some AUDIT messages, but WE MUST take in account that PAC service is reusing transactions from previous epSOS 1 services, and for that we must keep compliance or have a clear strategy for replacing AUDIT messages.

-- The Audit Trail messages need to be revised for epSOS 2 Services accordingly the SPECS.

--- The SPECS are available but still not implemented.

---- There are ISSUES that IMPED implementation.

[MM] It is not a fixing, it is an alignment with the epSOS 1.x and 2.x SPECS

For PPT we may proceed with this limitation - Release OpenNCP 2.0.0

[MF] There is the need for test the audit messages, for validating the implementation;

Are there any validators on Gazellein place for this point?

2. HCER QA Stage

- The service implementation is complete.

+++++++++++

(by Eric) Dear All

the IHE Europe development team is pleased to let you know the availability of the the MRO and HCER validator from the EVS Client application : http://gazelle.ihe.net/EVSClient

Please let us know if you find any issues.

+++++++++++

- What needs to be done in order to allow end-2-end test?

Make use of the Updated Transformation Manager (TM-43);
- Model Based Validator - in the new TSAM
- LKM: check the release by Posam frothe new Transformation Manager;
  - Wayting for answer;
Validate the produced document and messages (accordingly with the new HCER IHE validator.)
- epSOS 2.0 Services Messages Validators
  - - What is the current status of the epSOS 2.0 services message validators (specially HCER and MRO);
    - Is there any time frame for the readiness and availability of those validators at the EVSClient?
    I'm asking this questions because we have reached a development level in which the produced messages require validation, so that we can fine tune our implementation.
    This issue intends to represent the task of develop and make the validators available for further usage, and can be closed once they're ready for use by the OpenNCP team.
  - https://support.epsos.cz/issues/312
  - Eric Poiseau
    Marcelo, Konstantin is correct. The validation of the CDA document is available in the EVS Client application under the epSOS -> CDA menu entry. Concerning the validation of the transactions specific to the document MRO and HCER we have not yet found where they are specified ! if any one can point us to the right document where the new transactions are specified, then we will see how to add them in the XDStarClient simulator and we will also add the validation.
    - Follow: in the epSOS issue tracker;
The AUDIT Trail issues also applies to this service as well as for all epSOS 2 services.

3. epSOS 2.0 Audit Trail EventIDs (Discussion of Roadmap)

-- The adoption of new EventIDs does not seem to bring any issue apart from the following line:

--- We need to report to the specification team that there is no information about the related transaction on each EventID (e.g. "XCA::CrossGatewayQuery" will replace "epsosPatientService::List" and "epsosOrderService::List", therefore it would not be possible to distinguish them) - perhaps it should be that way, but further clarification is needed.

https://openncp.atlassian.net/browse/AA-32

[To-Do] LKM: Ask for clarification to the specification team about the missing transaction info on Audit Messages details

5. OpenNCP Support

1. Mika has fixed the database connection leaks, changes are in develop branch. (INT-62 and TSAM-1)

PT: Had some evidences of this problem in our training environment;
- PT needs to restart the Application Server (Apache) very often regarding some leaks;

2. During the merge of 1.1.3 and develop branches some functionality was lost, check INT-63.

BLOCKING ISSUES TO SOLVE

6. epSOS2: TSAM-sync adaptation for CTS2 compliance

Arnaud and Giorgio were not present.
- As they are key person on this issue, it discussion has been post pone for the next meeting.
Arnaud:
- Spec last update was in May;
- Specs were shared with CareCom;
Marcello Melgara
- Needed a formal validation from Spec in order to obtain vendors/industry alignment;
- Platform independent specification (SOAP or REST implementation decision);
LKM
- Stand by wait for: MM, Arnaud and other, for starting the validation of the specification

NEXT Steps

[MF - ToDo] Release OpenNCP 2.0.0
- Resolve BLOCKING ISSUES
- TEST artefacts
- Publish artefacts
[LKM - in Progres] LKM: wait for information from Posam about the newTransformation Manager;
[MF - in Progress] Clarification on the status from the - epSOS 2.0 Services Messages Validators
- [Joerg Caumanns] Transactions (https://support.epsos.cz/issues/312)
  - Specification providing for IHE develop Validators;
- Documents (https://support.epsos.cz/issues/312)
  - IHE validators already available for HCER and MRO
- [Joerg Caumanns] Audit Trails
  - Specification Clarification
  - Specification providing for IHE develop Validatores;
[MM+AG] TSAM-sync adaptation for CTS2 compliance
- Work for start the validation of the specification
[LKM - ToDo] Licinio Schedule 'next' meeting - proposed date June 25th, 2013, 15h00 CET