...

Skype: skype: steen.manniche (if Steen not available: sirLicman)

Participants:

Licinio Mano Aarne Roosi <licinioAarne.mano@iuz.pt>,
Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.seRoosi@affecto.com>,
Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,
Alexander Berler (a.berler@gnomon.com.gr) <a.berler@gnomon.com.gr>,
Anders Nyström <Anders.Nystrom@apotekensservice.se>,
Arnaud Gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>,  
Fredrik Dahlman <fredrik.dahlman@cag.se>,
Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>,
Gergely Heja <heja.gergely@eski.hu>,
Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>
Ivo Pinheiro (ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt) <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>,
Konstantin Hypponen <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>,
Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>,
Licinio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>,
Marcello Melgara <Marcello.Melgara@cnt.lispa.it>,
Mate Beštek <mate.bestek@gmail.com>
Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>,
Mika Myllyvirta <mika.myllyvirta@kela.fi>,
Mindaugas Ajauskas <mindaugas.ajauskas@lispa.it>,
Norbert Repas <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>,
Stefan Gustafsson (stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se) <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,
Aarne Roosi (Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com) <Aarne.Roosi@affecto.comPatrick Ruch <Patrick.Ruch@unige.ch>,
Tomaz Cebular <Tomaz.Cebular@ivz-rs.si>
Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,
Stefan Gustafsson <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,
Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>
Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>,

MEETING NOTES

1. Release Management Plan (2 versions vs 1 version)

...

• 1st: Licinio > 3 lines email to raise the question to TPM:

  Jira Legacy
  server JIRA (openncp.atlassian.net) serverId 5eab37ce-f509-3cbb-9925-c13d0f8d6d44 key AA-32

  , in order to put it in the risk assessment sheet.
  • TPM and NEPC
  • Risk in software development incompatibilities;
  • Risk of stopping pilots already in operation;
• 2nd: Prepare a WikiPage about mitigation plan regarding version merging;
• Current Release plan: Maintaining legacy branches (aka the 1.1.n vs. 2.x shootout)

2. QA Process - Team

[Gareth]

In the OpenNCP development project we lack a dedicated test team.  Normally there would be test specialists who do test planning and conduct system tests during a sprint.  This is followed by acceptance test when the software goes through a cycle of QA and bug fixing.  I’ve always thought it strange that we don’t follow this practice

• OpenNCP 1.1.1 Release
  • Longer Code Freeze > for Quality Assurance
  • Norbert, Stéphane
  • Konstantin: More unit tests, less regression test;

3. Development Status

• HCER-Client:
  
  • Konstantin: meeting: request to GNOMON for GUI implementation > that Marcello is checking with Gnomon
  • Marcello: negotiation with Gnomon; risk of stop the development of HCER tool - negotiation with PMT and project coordinator;
  • Marcello: conversation with Gnomon regarding LRT and MTC, to manage effort;
  • Konstantin: CDA Specifications and content are clear;
• HCER-Server:
  • The implementation is ready, and can be committed;
    • DON'T include AUDIT messages, because they can break some  
  • Changes are been committed to the development
  • Ready for integration with the HCER-Client.
  • Fonseca: add some comments in the client connector -share them;
• PAC:
  • Key task: Adjust Server side to support new assertions:
    • We can now accomplish task when we have resources available.
• OpenNCP
  • Portal, TM and TSAM: for sustainability, SHOULD be ready for improvement without of the initial providers.
    • Steen already done improvements in the past and ask for review for the initial  providers.
    • BUT:

NEXT Steps