Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

...

Skype: skype: steen.manniche (if Steen not available: sirLicman)

Participants:

Licinio Mano Aarne Roosi <licinioAarne.mano@iuzRoosi@affecto.ptcom>,
Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>,
Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,
Alexander Berler (a.berler@gnomon.com.gr) <a.berler@gnomon.com.gr>,
Anders Nyström <Anders.Nystrom@apotekensservice.se>,
Arnaud Gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>,  
Fredrik Dahlman <fredrik.dahlman@cag.se>,
Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>,
Gergely Heja <heja.gergely@eski.hu>,
Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>
Ivo Pinheiro (ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt) <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>,
Konstantin Hypponen <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>,
Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>,
Licinio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>,
Marcello Melgara <Marcello.Melgara@cnt.lispa.it>,
Mate Beštek <mate.bestek@gmail.com>
Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>,
Mika Myllyvirta <mika.myllyvirta@kela.fi>,
Mindaugas Ajauskas <mindaugas.ajauskas@lispa.it>,
Norbert Repas <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>,
Stefan Gustafsson (stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se) <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,
Aarne Roosi (Aarne.Roosi@affecto.com) <Aarne.Roosi@affecto.comPatrick Ruch <Patrick.Ruch@unige.ch>,
Tomaz Cebular <Tomaz.Cebular@ivz-rs.si>
Steen Manniche <STMA@ssi.dk>,
Stefan Gustafsson <stefan.gustafsson@callistaenterprise.se>,
Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>
Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>,

 

MEETING NOTES

1. Release Management Plan (2 versions vs 1 version)

...

  • We are few in the OpenNCP Community
  • We should not proliferate technical solutions
  • We should not start something call 2.x and maintain something call 1.x.
  • 2.0.0 should be fully compliant with the the 1.x.x
  • Work for sustainability, to many branches will be difficult to maintain in the future.
  • Witch are the audit messages incompatibilities?
    • Should we rise the issue in order to avoid the incompatibilities?
  • Agrees with functionality/interfaces without audit logging BUT we MUST raise the incompatibilities to the Marcello Melgara

[Licinio]

  • Why and what where the reasons for 2.x.x breaks 1.x.x

 

[Konstantin]

  • Incompatibilities
    • Specifications concerning audit messages are incompatible;
    • It does not affect semantic interoperability or other interoperability dimensions.
    • ATNA changes?? not yet stable.

...

  • Agrees with konstantin
  • Thinks: we could just skip the audit logging and focus in interfaces and functionality;

[Marcello Mel]

...

 

[Fonseca]

  • Functional changes are not to big, so it may be possible to merge branches.

 

[LicinioNext Steps]

  • 1st: Licinio > 3 lines email to raise the question to TPM:
    Jira Legacy
    serverJIRA (openncp.atlassian.net)
    serverId5eab37ce-f509-3cbb-9925-c13d0f8d6d44
    keyAA-32
    , in order to put it in the risk assessment sheet.
    • TPM and NEPC
    • Risk in software development incompatibilities;
    • Risk of stopping pilots already in operation;
  • 2nd: Prepare a WikiPage about mitigation plan regarding version merging;
  • Current Release plan: Maintaining legacy branches (aka the 1.1.n vs. 2.x shootout)

 

2. QA Process - Team

[to do]Gareth]

In the OpenNCP development project we lack a dedicated test team.  Normally there would be test specialists who do test planning and conduct system tests during a sprint.  This is followed by acceptance test when the software goes through a cycle of QA and bug fixing.  I’ve always thought it strange that we don’t follow this practice

  • OpenNCP 1.1.1 Release
    • Longer Code Freeze > for Quality Assurance
    • Norbert, Stéphane
    • Konstantin: More unit tests, less regression test;

3. Development Status

[to do]
 

NEXT Steps

- [To Do - Who?]  ...

...

  • HCER-Client:
    • Konstantin: meeting: request to GNOMON for GUI implementation > that Marcello is checking with Gnomon
    • Marcello: negotiation with Gnomon; risk of stop the development of HCER tool - negotiation with PMT and project coordinator;
    • Marcello: conversation with Gnomon regarding LRT and MTC, to manage effort;
    • Konstantin: CDA Specifications and content are clear;
  • HCER-Server:
    • The implementation is ready, and can be committed;
      • DON'T include AUDIT messages, because they can break some  
    • Changes are been committed to the development
    • Ready for integration with the HCER-Client.
    • Fonseca: add some comments in the client connector -share them;
  • PAC:
    • Key task: Adjust Server side to support new assertions:
      • We can now accomplish task when we have resources available.
  • OpenNCP
    • Portal, TM and TSAM: for sustainability, SHOULD be ready for improvement without of the initial providers.
      • Steen already done improvements in the past and ask for review for the initial  providers.
      • BUT:

 

NEXT Steps

- [To Do - Who?Licínio Mano...Prepare email for risk Assessment
- [To Do - Who? Licínio ManoInitiate Wiki Page about mitigation plan regarding OpenNCP Version (1...x & 2.x) merging
- [To Do - Who? Licínio ManoSchedule 'next' meeting - proposed date mmm ddMar 19, 2013, hhhmm 10h00 CET