Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Licinio Kustra Mano

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Licinio Kustra Mano

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 

6. epSOS2: TSAM-sync adaptation for CTS2 compliance

  • Arnaud and Giorgio were not present.
    • As they are key person on this issue, it discussion has been post pone for the next meeting.
  • Arnaud:
    • Spec last update was in May;
    • Specs were shared with CareCom;
  • Marcello Melgara
    • Needed a formal validation from Spec in order to obtain vendors/industry alignment;
    • Platform independent specification (SOAP or REST implementation decision);
  •  LKM
    • Stand by wait for: MM, Arnaud and other, for starting the validation of the specification

NEXT Steps


  •  [Done] MF: Ask for clarification to the specification team about the missing transaction info on Audit Messages details++++++++++++++++++++++
    From:     Marcelo Fonseca <marcelo.fonseca@iuz.pt>
        Subject:     Clarification on new Audit Messages specifications
        Date:     12 June, 2013 12:35:23 PM GMT+01:00
        To:     Jörg Caumanns <joerg.caumanns@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, Sören Bittins <soeren.bittins@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
        Cc:     Marcello Melgara <marcello.melgara@cnt.lispa.it>, Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>, Gareth Woodham <Gareth.Woodham@apotekensservice.se>, Konstantine Hypponen (finland) <konstantin.hypponen@kela.fi>, Kostas Karkaletsis <k.karkaletsis@gnomon.com.gr>, Répás, Norbert <norbert.repas@elga.gv.at>, Stéphane Spahni <stephane.spahni@hcuge.ch>, arnaud gaudinat <arnaud.gaudinat@hesge.ch>, Ivo Pinheiro <ivo.pinheiro@iuz.pt>, Licínio Mano <licinio.mano@iuz.pt>

    Dear Jörg Caumanns, Sören Bittins

    The OpenNCP team is about to start implementing the new specifications for Audit Messages and we need some clarification on the following items

    - The new specifications for Event details (ID's, Names) do not clarify which transaction / document is involved (e.g. "XCA::CrossGatewayQuery" now replaces "epsosPatientService::List" and "epsosOrderService::List", therefore it is not possible to distinguish them)) - is there any information present in the audit message that allows to distinguish which document was involved?

    - That also applies to the provision of data - with the new "ITI-41" event ID, we only have the "XDR::ProvideandRegisterDocumentSet-b" event name, therefore both dispensation and HCER services will produce the same audit message.

    Thank you very much for your attention.

    Best Regards,

    --

    Marcelo Fonseca

    epSOS - Portuguese Technical Team

  • ++++++++++++++++++++++
     
  • [To-Do]  LKM: check the release by Posam frothe newTransformation Manager;
  • [Done] Kostas: Bring knowledge about the CDA display tool - render the information for HcP.https://openncp.atlassian.net/wiki/x/M4AdAQ
    [in Progress] Clarification on the status from the - epSOS 2.0 Services Messages Validators
    [To-DoMF - ToDo] Release OpenNCP 2.0.0
    • Resolve BLOCKING ISSUES
    • TEST artefacts
    • Publish artefacts

  • [LKM - in Progres]  LKM: wait for information from Posam about the newTransformation Manager;

  • [MF - in Progress] Clarification on the status from the - epSOS 2.0 Services Messages Validators
  • [MM+AG] TSAM-sync adaptation for CTS2 compliance
    • Work for start the validation of the specification

  • [LKM - ToDo] Licinio Schedule 'next' meeting - proposed date June 18th 25th, 2013, 10h00 15h00 CET